From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Nurul Azim

Nurul Azim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic. Of the five cited sources, two are brief mentions in versions of a list, two are about a politician who Azim may have treated (the articles don't mention him), and one is a newspaper article written by him. Searches of the usual types found pages published by him and his employers, [1] [2] but no significant coverage in independent sources.

Turning to the criteria of WP:PROF, his selected articles are in obscure journals with little impact. I can find no citations of his work. He is a fellow of the Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, but in contrast to the IEEE (the example used in criterion #3), where fellows must be nominated by others and no more than one in one thousand may be selected per year, one obtains fellowship in the BCPS not by election, but by passing an exam, and about two-thirds of the total membership are fellows. [3] Fellowship in BCPS is not reserved as a highly selective honor. Worldbruce ( talk) 18:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 23:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply

-- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Nurul Azim

Nurul Azim (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic. Of the five cited sources, two are brief mentions in versions of a list, two are about a politician who Azim may have treated (the articles don't mention him), and one is a newspaper article written by him. Searches of the usual types found pages published by him and his employers, [1] [2] but no significant coverage in independent sources.

Turning to the criteria of WP:PROF, his selected articles are in obscure journals with little impact. I can find no citations of his work. He is a fellow of the Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons, but in contrast to the IEEE (the example used in criterion #3), where fellows must be nominated by others and no more than one in one thousand may be selected per year, one obtains fellowship in the BCPS not by election, but by passing an exam, and about two-thirds of the total membership are fellows. [3] Fellowship in BCPS is not reserved as a highly selective honor. Worldbruce ( talk) 18:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 23:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply

-- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook