The result was delete per WP:SNOW. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply
It is highly unlikely, and thus far unproven, that this phase has become a part of the common film lexicon. There's quite a jump between a single discussion thread and a phrase becoming part of cinematic dialect, and new colloquialisms aren't apt to be fully established within a week of a movie's release. A phrase a couple of IMDB users toss around in a single thread is not a new colloquialism. Vianello ( talk) 08:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone on the IMDB forums told you to, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Gracious. Do we have a WP:SNOW situation on our hands here? - Vianello ( talk) 03:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply
It is highly unlikely, and thus far unproven, that this phase has become a part of the common film lexicon. There's quite a jump between a single discussion thread and a phrase becoming part of cinematic dialect, and new colloquialisms aren't apt to be fully established within a week of a movie's release. A phrase a couple of IMDB users toss around in a single thread is not a new colloquialism. Vianello ( talk) 08:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone on the IMDB forums told you to, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Gracious. Do we have a WP:SNOW situation on our hands here? - Vianello ( talk) 03:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply