The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 17:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Non-notable organization lacking non-trivial support. One reference does not mention the organization and the other is the organization's website.
reddogsix (
talk) 15:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
delete fails WP:ORG. Lacking in depth coverage, only has existed for a year so unless it's done something remarkable unlikely to have significant coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 16:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete promo advert, trying to raise funds?, no coverage in independent sources, the refs in article are 3 trivial mentions and the subject's own website, fails
WP:CORPDEPTHKraxler (
talk) 20:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 17:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Non-notable organization lacking non-trivial support. One reference does not mention the organization and the other is the organization's website.
reddogsix (
talk) 15:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
delete fails WP:ORG. Lacking in depth coverage, only has existed for a year so unless it's done something remarkable unlikely to have significant coverage.
LibStar (
talk) 16:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete promo advert, trying to raise funds?, no coverage in independent sources, the refs in article are 3 trivial mentions and the subject's own website, fails
WP:CORPDEPTHKraxler (
talk) 20:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.