The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article describes a relatively niche pastry that I don't believe meets the notability requirements. I do believe it could be merged with
hot cross bun. Why? I Ask 17:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete - Article is likely a hoax. None of the sources mention the term and the image has nothing to with it. Kori (
@)18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
It could be that it's a hoax article referencing other hoax articles. Make sure to check the reliability of the listed sources. Kirbanzo(
userpage -
talk -
contribs)18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Redirect to
Hot cross bun#Other versions - The coverage of the product is definitely not enough to show this variant of the buns being independently notable, and they are already covered in the main article. Quite honestly, I don't think these are notable enough to even be mentioned there - aside from the two articles currently being used in sources, the only other source I can find talking about the term is just a brief mention saying that the product was a failure and discontinued shortly after. But, as long as that information is there, using this as a redirect is about the best that can be done.
Rorshacma (
talk)
18:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article describes a relatively niche pastry that I don't believe meets the notability requirements. I do believe it could be merged with
hot cross bun. Why? I Ask 17:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete - Article is likely a hoax. None of the sources mention the term and the image has nothing to with it. Kori (
@)18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
It could be that it's a hoax article referencing other hoax articles. Make sure to check the reliability of the listed sources. Kirbanzo(
userpage -
talk -
contribs)18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Redirect to
Hot cross bun#Other versions - The coverage of the product is definitely not enough to show this variant of the buns being independently notable, and they are already covered in the main article. Quite honestly, I don't think these are notable enough to even be mentioned there - aside from the two articles currently being used in sources, the only other source I can find talking about the term is just a brief mention saying that the product was a failure and discontinued shortly after. But, as long as that information is there, using this as a redirect is about the best that can be done.
Rorshacma (
talk)
18:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.