From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Northern Somali Unionist Movement (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is mainly based on a singular source of original research. Additionally, a google search of "Northern Somali Unionist Movement" only returns 84 results. Therefore, it is unlikely that it meets notability guidelines. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete I'm not seeing SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist ( talk) 15:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Soman, WP:GNG indicates that a topic is seen as notable if it received significant coverage addressing the topic directly and in detail, none of the links above go further than naming this entity, guidelines specifically mention that "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". -- Kzl55 ( talk) 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete With limited original scholarly sources and 2 out of the 3 reference links not existing, article does not meet WP:GNG. Ciiseciise007 ( talk)
  • Delete - Both Google Books as well as Scholar return almost zero reliable sources on the topic [2] [3]. A handful of sources offer trivial mentions of this group but no detailed or significant coverage is available in reliable sources to address notability or warrant a stand alone article per WP:GNG. Additionally, the article is mainly authored by Middayexpress [4], a permanently blocked long term vandal of the Somali project [5]. -- Kzl55 ( talk) 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Northern Somali Unionist Movement (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is mainly based on a singular source of original research. Additionally, a google search of "Northern Somali Unionist Movement" only returns 84 results. Therefore, it is unlikely that it meets notability guidelines. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. Jacob300 ( talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete I'm not seeing SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist ( talk) 15:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Soman, WP:GNG indicates that a topic is seen as notable if it received significant coverage addressing the topic directly and in detail, none of the links above go further than naming this entity, guidelines specifically mention that "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". -- Kzl55 ( talk) 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete With limited original scholarly sources and 2 out of the 3 reference links not existing, article does not meet WP:GNG. Ciiseciise007 ( talk)
  • Delete - Both Google Books as well as Scholar return almost zero reliable sources on the topic [2] [3]. A handful of sources offer trivial mentions of this group but no detailed or significant coverage is available in reliable sources to address notability or warrant a stand alone article per WP:GNG. Additionally, the article is mainly authored by Middayexpress [4], a permanently blocked long term vandal of the Somali project [5]. -- Kzl55 ( talk) 10:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook