- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Northern Ireland Virtual Tissue Archive
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Northern Ireland Virtual Tissue Archive ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A scientific organization that does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. Of the four sources included in the article, two are primary sources (both of which are now dead links, leading me to suspect this group no longer exists), and two are not about the organization at all, merely on the concept of tissue banking as a whole. I searched for sources, both under the group's full name and the acronym, and while a few results come up listing them in directories or having been at a conference, I am finding no actual in-depth coverage of the group at all. Looking at the article history, it appears to have been initially created by a WP:SPA that had an obvious connection to the group it was writing about. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – no significant coverage in reliable sources. The best I can find is this, which looks an awful lot like a press release. In any event, the organization falls far short of having multiple NORG-compliant sources. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Northern Ireland Virtual Tissue Archive
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Northern Ireland Virtual Tissue Archive ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A scientific organization that does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. Of the four sources included in the article, two are primary sources (both of which are now dead links, leading me to suspect this group no longer exists), and two are not about the organization at all, merely on the concept of tissue banking as a whole. I searched for sources, both under the group's full name and the acronym, and while a few results come up listing them in directories or having been at a conference, I am finding no actual in-depth coverage of the group at all. Looking at the article history, it appears to have been initially created by a WP:SPA that had an obvious connection to the group it was writing about. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – no significant coverage in reliable sources. The best I can find is this, which looks an awful lot like a press release. In any event, the organization falls far short of having multiple NORG-compliant sources. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.