From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 17:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply

North Kanpur (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the first criterion of WP: GEOLAND, that is to say it has no mention on the websites of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India and Government of Uttar Pradesh, so in all probability isn't a legally recognized place.

Plus, the article is unreferenced, contains an enormous amount of Original Research, the content is largely false, as both sides of Kanpur come under Kanpur Municipal Corporation, Kanpur Nagar district and Kanpur division.

Also, thanks to DreamLinker for letting me know about the article(s).
Regards, SshibumXZ ( Talk) ( Contributions). 19:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  12:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- Per WP:GEOLAND. Not an assembly constituency and even major metropolises in India have not been split this way unless they are suburban areas. The lack of sources makes it even more dubious as to whether such a designated area exists. MT Train Discuss 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: The discussions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Kanpur are related. Ilyina Olya Yakovna ( talk) 14:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 17:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply

North Kanpur (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the first criterion of WP: GEOLAND, that is to say it has no mention on the websites of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India and Government of Uttar Pradesh, so in all probability isn't a legally recognized place.

Plus, the article is unreferenced, contains an enormous amount of Original Research, the content is largely false, as both sides of Kanpur come under Kanpur Municipal Corporation, Kanpur Nagar district and Kanpur division.

Also, thanks to DreamLinker for letting me know about the article(s).
Regards, SshibumXZ ( Talk) ( Contributions). 19:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  12:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- Per WP:GEOLAND. Not an assembly constituency and even major metropolises in India have not been split this way unless they are suburban areas. The lack of sources makes it even more dubious as to whether such a designated area exists. MT Train Discuss 13:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: The discussions Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Kanpur - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Kanpur are related. Ilyina Olya Yakovna ( talk) 14:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook