- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Norfolk Family History Society
- Norfolk Family History Society ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Geneaological society that doesn't appear to have been the subject of any actual journalistic or scholarly coverage; fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Julietdeltalima (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- DElete -- I do not believe local family history societies are likely to be notable; they are not learned societies, though no doubt they do good work in transcribing records, etc. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Geneaological societies are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Norfolk Family History Society
- Norfolk Family History Society ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Geneaological society that doesn't appear to have been the subject of any actual journalistic or scholarly coverage; fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Julietdeltalima (talk) 02:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 02:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 05:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- DElete -- I do not believe local family history societies are likely to be notable; they are not learned societies, though no doubt they do good work in transcribing records, etc. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Geneaological societies are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.