- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Norconex Web Crawler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a shame, but there doesn't seem to be anything beyond the barest of mentions in independent RS. A redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers would probably be the best option. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and Software. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers: per nomination, currently fails WP:GNG with no significant coverage at all from independent sources Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 5 references listed which from independent sources.
- Please also take a look at Mentions in Academic Research portion where academic research with mentions of the Crawler are listed. These are independent sources as well.
OhTwadi (
talk)
22:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- All of which having barely significant coverage... TappyTurtle [ talk | contribs] 02:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I see other open source crawlers which have much less in terms of content and/or references and yet are considered fine. One example:
MnoGoSearch
OhTwadi (
talk)
22:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- From what I could see, that article was considered "no consensus, with no prejudice against speedy renomination". Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Web_crawler#Open-source_crawlers: The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. Medium.com and blogs can’t establish notability. It would be better to redirect this article to Web_crawler#Open-source_crawlers. GrabUp - Talk 16:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Norconex Web Crawler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's a shame, but there doesn't seem to be anything beyond the barest of mentions in independent RS. A redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers would probably be the best option. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, and Software. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Web crawler#Open-source crawlers: per nomination, currently fails WP:GNG with no significant coverage at all from independent sources Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 5 references listed which from independent sources.
- Please also take a look at Mentions in Academic Research portion where academic research with mentions of the Crawler are listed. These are independent sources as well.
OhTwadi (
talk)
22:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- All of which having barely significant coverage... TappyTurtle [ talk | contribs] 02:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I see other open source crawlers which have much less in terms of content and/or references and yet are considered fine. One example:
MnoGoSearch
OhTwadi (
talk)
22:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- From what I could see, that article was considered "no consensus, with no prejudice against speedy renomination". Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Web_crawler#Open-source_crawlers: The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. Medium.com and blogs can’t establish notability. It would be better to redirect this article to Web_crawler#Open-source_crawlers. GrabUp - Talk 16:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.