- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted for failure to have achieved notability at this time. Opinions of editors with newly created accounts are discounted due to their likely lack of familiarity with Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion (all keep votes other than the article creator come from accounts created within the past few weeks). bd2412 T 19:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Non è mai Passato ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The plethora of references provide no evidence of notability (they're functionally equivalent to IMDB, apart from a couple of refs which don't apply to the film). This is unsurprising because it's a short low budget film that hasn't been released yet. Requests for the author to read and comprehend WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:NFILM have gone nowhere. The film may or may not achieve notability after release, but it hasn't yet ( WP:NFF). ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 22:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The film is present on
IMDb,
MUBI,
Allocine,
Port.hu,
AllMovie,
FilmAffinity,
TV Time,
Orange SA, Adoro Cinema, FilmTV (
Mondadori), Senscritique, CinemaItaliano, CSFD, Filmstarts, Letteboxd, Trailer Addict etc. Moreover the film is also present in the
Corriere della Sera and other local/regional newspapers.
Giovannix94 (
talk)
23:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Those are all listings, not reliable sources covering them in-depth. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Is a list of trusted sites except IMDb which can be modified by users only after approval. Giovannix94 ( talk) 14:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you think a "trusted" site is but it's not WP:COVERAGE and if it's like iMDb, it's certainly not a reliable. A list /= a valid source to establish notability. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The principal photography of the film is confirmed by reliable sources, in addition there is also the trailer of the film that proves the reliability and the release in 2018 ( WP:NFF). Alexandros8998 ( talk) 12:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The sources provided in the article are independent of each other (there are also national newspapers), this proves the reliability of the film. ( WP:N and WP:NFILM) Lester Joice ( talk) 12:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:TOOSOON applies here. PhilKnight ( talk) 00:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Film respects WP:NFILM. Kenny34568 ( talk) 20:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The Keep !voters all have few edits, and at least some appear to have an undeclared
conflict of interest. ~
Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~
06:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- They are unfounded accusations, having few changes does not mean anything, but since you put it on this floor and you play evidently dirty,I have verified that for a long time you are eliminating numerous pages that meet the requirements,including this film, an administrator has already told you that he meets the requirements (not accepting your quick deletion). You are doing everything to eliminate it again. Giovannix94 ( talk) 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: It passes WP:NFILM. This movie is present in national newspapers and has reliable sources. Ciccio.santini ( talk) 09:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we please have opinions by editors with more than a handful of edits each?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Can we please have opinions by editors with more than a handful of edits each?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I vote for the keep, the film fully meets the requirements. '"Xargov'" 17:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted for failure to have achieved notability at this time. Opinions of editors with newly created accounts are discounted due to their likely lack of familiarity with Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion (all keep votes other than the article creator come from accounts created within the past few weeks). bd2412 T 19:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Non è mai Passato ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The plethora of references provide no evidence of notability (they're functionally equivalent to IMDB, apart from a couple of refs which don't apply to the film). This is unsurprising because it's a short low budget film that hasn't been released yet. Requests for the author to read and comprehend WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:NFILM have gone nowhere. The film may or may not achieve notability after release, but it hasn't yet ( WP:NFF). ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 22:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 22:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The film is present on
IMDb,
MUBI,
Allocine,
Port.hu,
AllMovie,
FilmAffinity,
TV Time,
Orange SA, Adoro Cinema, FilmTV (
Mondadori), Senscritique, CinemaItaliano, CSFD, Filmstarts, Letteboxd, Trailer Addict etc. Moreover the film is also present in the
Corriere della Sera and other local/regional newspapers.
Giovannix94 (
talk)
23:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Those are all listings, not reliable sources covering them in-depth. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Is a list of trusted sites except IMDb which can be modified by users only after approval. Giovannix94 ( talk) 14:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you think a "trusted" site is but it's not WP:COVERAGE and if it's like iMDb, it's certainly not a reliable. A list /= a valid source to establish notability. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The principal photography of the film is confirmed by reliable sources, in addition there is also the trailer of the film that proves the reliability and the release in 2018 ( WP:NFF). Alexandros8998 ( talk) 12:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The sources provided in the article are independent of each other (there are also national newspapers), this proves the reliability of the film. ( WP:N and WP:NFILM) Lester Joice ( talk) 12:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:TOOSOON applies here. PhilKnight ( talk) 00:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Film respects WP:NFILM. Kenny34568 ( talk) 20:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: The Keep !voters all have few edits, and at least some appear to have an undeclared
conflict of interest. ~
Hydronium~Hydroxide~
(Talk)~
06:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- They are unfounded accusations, having few changes does not mean anything, but since you put it on this floor and you play evidently dirty,I have verified that for a long time you are eliminating numerous pages that meet the requirements,including this film, an administrator has already told you that he meets the requirements (not accepting your quick deletion). You are doing everything to eliminate it again. Giovannix94 ( talk) 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: It passes WP:NFILM. This movie is present in national newspapers and has reliable sources. Ciccio.santini ( talk) 09:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we please have opinions by editors with more than a handful of edits each?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Can we please have opinions by editors with more than a handful of edits each?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I vote for the keep, the film fully meets the requirements. '"Xargov'" 17:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.