The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Nothing to show notability or interest beyond a dictionary term and it's already at Wiktionary (
wikt:non-event).
clpo13(
talk) 19:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
If the article doesn't get expanded or turned into a disambiguation page, then it's best to
soft redirect to wiktionary: the page has on average received 95 views per day for the last three months
[1] and these are mostly due to people searching for the term, as barely anything links there.
Uanfala (
talk) 19:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. Even more interesting - it received 4000 page views on June 24 2016
[2]. I am wondering what large "non-event" took place on that day, where people had to look this up? That is amazing. It has leveled off to between 40 and 50 page views by July 7. Overall, it appears the average is actually around 40 page views per day
[3].
Well, I hope this fulfilled everyone's trivia quota for the day. In any case,, this is not a topic it is only a word - so my Ivote is for whatever consensus decides.
Steve Quinn (
talk) 05:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Soft redirect to Wiktionary per Patar Knight. Per
WP:NOTDIC, does not qualify for a standalone article.--
Ddcm8991 (
talk) 16:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Nothing to show notability or interest beyond a dictionary term and it's already at Wiktionary (
wikt:non-event).
clpo13(
talk) 19:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
If the article doesn't get expanded or turned into a disambiguation page, then it's best to
soft redirect to wiktionary: the page has on average received 95 views per day for the last three months
[1] and these are mostly due to people searching for the term, as barely anything links there.
Uanfala (
talk) 19:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. Even more interesting - it received 4000 page views on June 24 2016
[2]. I am wondering what large "non-event" took place on that day, where people had to look this up? That is amazing. It has leveled off to between 40 and 50 page views by July 7. Overall, it appears the average is actually around 40 page views per day
[3].
Well, I hope this fulfilled everyone's trivia quota for the day. In any case,, this is not a topic it is only a word - so my Ivote is for whatever consensus decides.
Steve Quinn (
talk) 05:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Soft redirect to Wiktionary per Patar Knight. Per
WP:NOTDIC, does not qualify for a standalone article.--
Ddcm8991 (
talk) 16:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.