- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Nokia C310i
- Nokia C310i ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this article should be deleted, because there is no official information about this particular phone model. Mardus ( talk) 20:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Possibly a Chinese specific version of the 6310i it seems; Talk:List_of_Nokia_products#Nokia_C310i. wintonian talk 18:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 8. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 13:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 13:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - practically all the information that can be found about this phone seems to originate from this same wikipedia article.-- Staberinde ( talk) 15:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per comments above. Not even enough to merge. Onel5969 TT me 16:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Nokia C310i
- Nokia C310i ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this article should be deleted, because there is no official information about this particular phone model. Mardus ( talk) 20:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Possibly a Chinese specific version of the 6310i it seems; Talk:List_of_Nokia_products#Nokia_C310i. wintonian talk 18:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 8. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 17:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 13:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 13:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - practically all the information that can be found about this phone seems to originate from this same wikipedia article.-- Staberinde ( talk) 15:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per comments above. Not even enough to merge. Onel5969 TT me 16:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.