- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Daintree National Park. Any content worth merging is available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noah, Queensland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another Queensland locality with no population and no claim to notability. Fails both WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Mangoe ( talk) 01:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The locality has no population because much of it is in the Daintree National Park within the Wet Tropics of Queensland, a UNESCO world heritage site. I have added this info to the article. Please also see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar, Queensland. Kerry ( talk) 05:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Merge - there's a strong case for WP:ATD as the page can easily be merged to Daintree National Park rather than deleted. I'm open to changing my !vote to keep if further sources are identified (which seems likely). Deus et lex ( talk) 09:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep-as per above. Best Regards.--- ✨Lazy Maniik✨ 05:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Sockpuppet of blocked user Lazy Maniik. ✗ plicit 14:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Within 9 minutes the above user copy-pasted either "keep as above" or "delete per nom" on 10 AFDs, clearly disruptive editing in my opinion. I think the comment should be disregarded. The user is welcome to return to make actual comments. Geschichte ( talk) 08:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Merge per Deus et lex. FOARP ( talk) 17:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge to Daintree National Park. There is (potential) valuable referencable encyclopedic content available, but the locality is not notable in its own right. Aoziwe ( talk) 12:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- (The locality's redirect needs to be maintained to maintain completeness of the geography of the shire it is in.) Aoziwe ( talk) 12:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Daintree National Park. Any content worth merging is available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noah, Queensland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another Queensland locality with no population and no claim to notability. Fails both WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Mangoe ( talk) 01:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The locality has no population because much of it is in the Daintree National Park within the Wet Tropics of Queensland, a UNESCO world heritage site. I have added this info to the article. Please also see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar, Queensland. Kerry ( talk) 05:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 01:46, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Merge - there's a strong case for WP:ATD as the page can easily be merged to Daintree National Park rather than deleted. I'm open to changing my !vote to keep if further sources are identified (which seems likely). Deus et lex ( talk) 09:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep-as per above. Best Regards.--- ✨Lazy Maniik✨ 05:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Sockpuppet of blocked user Lazy Maniik. ✗ plicit 14:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Within 9 minutes the above user copy-pasted either "keep as above" or "delete per nom" on 10 AFDs, clearly disruptive editing in my opinion. I think the comment should be disregarded. The user is welcome to return to make actual comments. Geschichte ( talk) 08:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Merge per Deus et lex. FOARP ( talk) 17:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge to Daintree National Park. There is (potential) valuable referencable encyclopedic content available, but the locality is not notable in its own right. Aoziwe ( talk) 12:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- (The locality's redirect needs to be maintained to maintain completeness of the geography of the shire it is in.) Aoziwe ( talk) 12:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.