- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, effectively per WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 02:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
No HATE Act
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- No HATE Act ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined prod based on talk page. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but simply a bill in house committee at the moment. Govtrack gives it a 5% chance of passing. Just another piece of legislation with very little likelihood of long-lasting impact. Onel5969 TT me 00:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nominator. Page can be created if and when the bill passes but is WP:TOOSOON. Meatsgains( talk) 00:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014 ( talk) 02:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete While it passes the letter of the general notability guideline, it appears to me that both of the sources provided inline are WP:ROUTINE and thus not particular to this bill rather than any other bill introduced in Congress. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- If it has not passed, it is not an Act.
Uncle G (
talk)
10:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's a proposed act.
Зенитная Самоходная Установка (
talk)
10:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- No, it is a Bill. It is not an Act of any shape. Uncle G ( talk) 10:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's a proposed act.
Зенитная Самоходная Установка (
talk)
10:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nomination. -- SalmanZ ( talk) 19:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete considering that the SPLC has been exposed as a high pressure marketing scheme and has been accused of perpetuating unequal status based on race and sexual harrassment, as well as continually having to walk back its ludicrous accusations involving calling all sorts of individuals hate, we need to stop playing into their marketing scheme, which this article does to a T. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, effectively per WP:SNOW. bd2412 T 02:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
No HATE Act
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- No HATE Act ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined prod based on talk page. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but simply a bill in house committee at the moment. Govtrack gives it a 5% chance of passing. Just another piece of legislation with very little likelihood of long-lasting impact. Onel5969 TT me 00:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nominator. Page can be created if and when the bill passes but is WP:TOOSOON. Meatsgains( talk) 00:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014 ( talk) 02:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete While it passes the letter of the general notability guideline, it appears to me that both of the sources provided inline are WP:ROUTINE and thus not particular to this bill rather than any other bill introduced in Congress. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- If it has not passed, it is not an Act.
Uncle G (
talk)
10:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's a proposed act.
Зенитная Самоходная Установка (
talk)
10:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- No, it is a Bill. It is not an Act of any shape. Uncle G ( talk) 10:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's a proposed act.
Зенитная Самоходная Установка (
talk)
10:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nomination. -- SalmanZ ( talk) 19:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete considering that the SPLC has been exposed as a high pressure marketing scheme and has been accused of perpetuating unequal status based on race and sexual harrassment, as well as continually having to walk back its ludicrous accusations involving calling all sorts of individuals hate, we need to stop playing into their marketing scheme, which this article does to a T. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.