The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Despite my best efforts to improve coverage about pornographic actors in the wake of the pornography biography notability guidelines being deprecated, Nikki Dial does not pass
WP:GNG. I spent time working on her article and found one poor quality interview from a non-mainstream porno review website and mere mentions about her elsewhere, everything else is a primary source from companies she has worked for or won awards from. Now, perhaps folks want to see winners of AVN Best Actress be
inherently notable, but, at this point, Ms. Dial does not pass our general notability guidelines. Thanks for your reviews and assuming good faith in my efforts.
Missvain (
talk)
04:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Was leaning towards keep based on the article content, then found a Google search was so thin I was questioning the verifiability of the entire article, cited sources aside. This is another one of these pre-internet era ones that could conceivably have decent coverage in reliable sources if someone had access to the right sources of that era. However, given that what is online is extremely poor, we've got nothing to show that anything more does exist, and I'm less confident that it might than some of the others I've already voted to delete, it needs deleting until and unless someone can come up with something better.
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
11:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Despite my best efforts to improve coverage about pornographic actors in the wake of the pornography biography notability guidelines being deprecated, Nikki Dial does not pass
WP:GNG. I spent time working on her article and found one poor quality interview from a non-mainstream porno review website and mere mentions about her elsewhere, everything else is a primary source from companies she has worked for or won awards from. Now, perhaps folks want to see winners of AVN Best Actress be
inherently notable, but, at this point, Ms. Dial does not pass our general notability guidelines. Thanks for your reviews and assuming good faith in my efforts.
Missvain (
talk)
04:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Was leaning towards keep based on the article content, then found a Google search was so thin I was questioning the verifiability of the entire article, cited sources aside. This is another one of these pre-internet era ones that could conceivably have decent coverage in reliable sources if someone had access to the right sources of that era. However, given that what is online is extremely poor, we've got nothing to show that anything more does exist, and I'm less confident that it might than some of the others I've already voted to delete, it needs deleting until and unless someone can come up with something better.
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
11:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.