The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 01:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Article written like an ad for Nike shoes, listing their products, and with no other sources than Nike themselves and a mention on Twitter.
Thomas.Wtalk to me 19:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 00:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete. Trivia, of no encyclopaedic value. Not only are the "sources" only Nike and Twitter, but they don't even support any significant part of the content of the article. Also, it probably wasn't intended as an advertisement, but that's what it looks like.
JamesBWatson (
talk) 21:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
KTC (
talk) 01:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Article written like an ad for Nike shoes, listing their products, and with no other sources than Nike themselves and a mention on Twitter.
Thomas.Wtalk to me 19:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mark Arsten (
talk) 00:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete. Trivia, of no encyclopaedic value. Not only are the "sources" only Nike and Twitter, but they don't even support any significant part of the content of the article. Also, it probably wasn't intended as an advertisement, but that's what it looks like.
JamesBWatson (
talk) 21:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.