- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Nike Air Max
- Nike Air Max ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article written like an ad listing a number of models of shoes made by Nike, with a single reference given: a now non-existant article in the Daily Mirror in 2007. Thomas.W talk to me 22:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Weak keep - The article's current state would mean that deletion would be no great loss. However, the line is a fairly notable one; [1] being in-depth coverage in a WP:RS, whilst there are [2] and [3], which I'm not sure about reliability-wise. Shoes don't tend to get coverage in mainstream media, but I think this line is notable enough. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Article needs improvement (I had a quick go at it) but this is a very famous and iconic shoe brand, as the references above show, and also
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] --
Colapeninsula (
talk) 14:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Do we need separate articles for every single line of shoes etc made by Nike? Short mentions in the main article about the company should, IMHO, be more than enough. Thomas.W talk to me 14:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Nike Air Max
- Nike Air Max ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article written like an ad listing a number of models of shoes made by Nike, with a single reference given: a now non-existant article in the Daily Mirror in 2007. Thomas.W talk to me 22:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Weak keep - The article's current state would mean that deletion would be no great loss. However, the line is a fairly notable one; [1] being in-depth coverage in a WP:RS, whilst there are [2] and [3], which I'm not sure about reliability-wise. Shoes don't tend to get coverage in mainstream media, but I think this line is notable enough. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Article needs improvement (I had a quick go at it) but this is a very famous and iconic shoe brand, as the references above show, and also
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] --
Colapeninsula (
talk) 14:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Do we need separate articles for every single line of shoes etc made by Nike? Short mentions in the main article about the company should, IMHO, be more than enough. Thomas.W talk to me 14:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.