The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Article needs some work, and will likely be little more than a stub, but I found a few sources for this company.
[1][2] I think one issue with finding sources is that the company is Swiss, making English sources a little harder to find.
Angryapathy (
talk)
13:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Putting aside all the interviews, trade publications, and the like, the only RS sigcov seems to be from the Le Temps article. And per
WP:MULTSOURCES "A single significant independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." If someone can find at least one more solid source, which isn't a product review, news of the company launching or acquiring another brand, or interview of the brothers, I'll be happy to reconsider my position. As it stands, this is little more than a promo piece on a non-notable ROTM business that makes products. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
05:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
DoubleGrazing, there's more in-depth coverage in Swiss media:
[5] is a company profile in
Le Nouvelliste, the principal regional newspaper;
[6] is a
Luzerner Zeitung article (subsidiary of a national media group) with also in-depth coverage in the context of an acquisition that made Nidecker the second-biggest snowboard manufacturer worldwide behind
Burton Snowboards. More specialized coverage in sports media is also easily found. Sandstein 05:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks @
Sandstein: I agree that those two sources (esp. the latter) look pretty solid, and on that basis I'm happy to change my !vote. I do think those need to be added as cites to the article, though. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
05:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Article needs some work, and will likely be little more than a stub, but I found a few sources for this company.
[1][2] I think one issue with finding sources is that the company is Swiss, making English sources a little harder to find.
Angryapathy (
talk)
13:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Putting aside all the interviews, trade publications, and the like, the only RS sigcov seems to be from the Le Temps article. And per
WP:MULTSOURCES "A single significant independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." If someone can find at least one more solid source, which isn't a product review, news of the company launching or acquiring another brand, or interview of the brothers, I'll be happy to reconsider my position. As it stands, this is little more than a promo piece on a non-notable ROTM business that makes products. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
05:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)reply
DoubleGrazing, there's more in-depth coverage in Swiss media:
[5] is a company profile in
Le Nouvelliste, the principal regional newspaper;
[6] is a
Luzerner Zeitung article (subsidiary of a national media group) with also in-depth coverage in the context of an acquisition that made Nidecker the second-biggest snowboard manufacturer worldwide behind
Burton Snowboards. More specialized coverage in sports media is also easily found. Sandstein 05:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks @
Sandstein: I agree that those two sources (esp. the latter) look pretty solid, and on that basis I'm happy to change my !vote. I do think those need to be added as cites to the article, though. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
05:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.