The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. The subject was getting coverage even before their stint on RPDR, including their modeling. All before RPDR, they had a 10-page spread in Volition Magazinehere, coverage in Outhere, a cover of Feroce Magazinehere, and coverage in Dark Beauty Magazine. During and post-RPDR, they were covered by Vogue Paris, Watcha Packin' , and Out (again), all three of which are currently used on the page. Given the subject's continued coverage, I think it would make the most sense to keep. --
Kbabej (
talk)
17:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per GNG and Kbabej. Also, I've asked the nominator to slow down on the RPDR contestant article deletion noms. There are already 5 to review. Thanks! ---
Another Believer(
Talk)18:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
As there is already a discussion on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Nicky_Doll_AfD_nomination about this, I don't understand how your comment is relevant to this nomination. I have already asked you to point me to guidelines about the number of AfD that one can nominate, but as of now you still haven't. I don't think this comment adds any value to this nomination or demonstrates that I am not following guidelines. --
Underpaid Intern (
talk)
18:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, Well, you're not exactly following the process correctly by nominating this article for being "mainly about the performer's participation in RuPaul's Drag Race". You're basing your argument on the current article's text, not all available coverage of the subject. No one would dispute these articles need to be expanded, but just because they are stubs does not mean the topics are not notable.
WP:BEFORE. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)18:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Another Believer, AfD discussions serve for this purpose. I am not claiming that all my nominations are correct. You have been telling me to "slow down" with the nominations and I have asked you, several times, to point me to any guideline that specifies the appropriate number of nominations one can do. I don't think the guideline you citing now is relevant to our discussion (while it may be valid for this nomination). --
Underpaid Intern (
talk)
19:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, We're going around in circles. I'll let others take over from here. Please do not waste editor time by nominating articles for deletion if you've not completed thorough sourcing reviews. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)19:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I wanted to address part of the nominator's nomination, which states (in part) "The article is mostly about the performer's participation in
RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12)". A friendly reminder that notability is based on available sourcing, not the sourcing from the article, as shown by
WP:NEXIST. --
Kbabej (
talk)
18:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. The subject was getting coverage even before their stint on RPDR, including their modeling. All before RPDR, they had a 10-page spread in Volition Magazinehere, coverage in Outhere, a cover of Feroce Magazinehere, and coverage in Dark Beauty Magazine. During and post-RPDR, they were covered by Vogue Paris, Watcha Packin' , and Out (again), all three of which are currently used on the page. Given the subject's continued coverage, I think it would make the most sense to keep. --
Kbabej (
talk)
17:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep per GNG and Kbabej. Also, I've asked the nominator to slow down on the RPDR contestant article deletion noms. There are already 5 to review. Thanks! ---
Another Believer(
Talk)18:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
As there is already a discussion on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Nicky_Doll_AfD_nomination about this, I don't understand how your comment is relevant to this nomination. I have already asked you to point me to guidelines about the number of AfD that one can nominate, but as of now you still haven't. I don't think this comment adds any value to this nomination or demonstrates that I am not following guidelines. --
Underpaid Intern (
talk)
18:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, Well, you're not exactly following the process correctly by nominating this article for being "mainly about the performer's participation in RuPaul's Drag Race". You're basing your argument on the current article's text, not all available coverage of the subject. No one would dispute these articles need to be expanded, but just because they are stubs does not mean the topics are not notable.
WP:BEFORE. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)18:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Another Believer, AfD discussions serve for this purpose. I am not claiming that all my nominations are correct. You have been telling me to "slow down" with the nominations and I have asked you, several times, to point me to any guideline that specifies the appropriate number of nominations one can do. I don't think the guideline you citing now is relevant to our discussion (while it may be valid for this nomination). --
Underpaid Intern (
talk)
19:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, We're going around in circles. I'll let others take over from here. Please do not waste editor time by nominating articles for deletion if you've not completed thorough sourcing reviews. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)19:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I wanted to address part of the nominator's nomination, which states (in part) "The article is mostly about the performer's participation in
RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12)". A friendly reminder that notability is based on available sourcing, not the sourcing from the article, as shown by
WP:NEXIST. --
Kbabej (
talk)
18:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.