The result was delete. There is a rough consensus to delete the article, however there doesn't appear to be a consensus about whether there should be a redirect. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Nicky Blair has no claim to be included in an encyclopedia; he has done nothing of significance in his own right (yet), and only achieves newspaper coverage as a result of the tabloid desire to flog papers by including tittle tattle about anyone connected with anyone famous. One could justify a passing reference to this young man in the articles concerning both his mother and father, but not an article in his own right; indeed, the current article contains nothing of substance. A search on his name should therefore result in a redirect to a parent. The Sage of Stamford ( talk) 21:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There is a rough consensus to delete the article, however there doesn't appear to be a consensus about whether there should be a redirect. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Nicky Blair has no claim to be included in an encyclopedia; he has done nothing of significance in his own right (yet), and only achieves newspaper coverage as a result of the tabloid desire to flog papers by including tittle tattle about anyone connected with anyone famous. One could justify a passing reference to this young man in the articles concerning both his mother and father, but not an article in his own right; indeed, the current article contains nothing of substance. A search on his name should therefore result in a redirect to a parent. The Sage of Stamford ( talk) 21:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply