The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (
talk) 02:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Individual simply is not notable. Little meaningful content. Association with someone famous is not enough.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Notability has not been established, and the article contains no references to verify what is there. -
SudoGhost™ 19:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (
talk) 02:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Individual simply is not notable. Little meaningful content. Association with someone famous is not enough.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Notability has not been established, and the article contains no references to verify what is there. -
SudoGhost™ 19:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.