- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Nick Baylis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nick Baylis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article of a non-notable person. Cannot see how this can pass WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 14:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 16:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Some publications to give an h-index of 9. Not enough to pass WP:Prof#C1 yet. No sure about WP:GNG, but very doubtful. Xxanthippe ( talk) 03:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete an overly promotional article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG and I don't see the notability or accomplishments to show any SNG is met. My search found a lot of ghits, but mainly first person or social media--not significant independent coverage about him in reliable sources. Papaursa ( talk) 19:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Nick Baylis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nick Baylis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article of a non-notable person. Cannot see how this can pass WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 14:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 16:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Some publications to give an h-index of 9. Not enough to pass WP:Prof#C1 yet. No sure about WP:GNG, but very doubtful. Xxanthippe ( talk) 03:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete an overly promotional article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG and I don't see the notability or accomplishments to show any SNG is met. My search found a lot of ghits, but mainly first person or social media--not significant independent coverage about him in reliable sources. Papaursa ( talk) 19:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.