The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable professor. Article was nominated for deletion previously (see here), but the debate was largely about academics in general, and was moved to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for inclusion of biographies/Academics and no consensus was reached. Nicholas Hopper is a promising young crypto researcher, and an assistant prof (not tenured) at UMN, and has about 10 technical papers of varying quality; the best has about 50 citations, which makes it a good paper, but not an especially important one. Not much more could be added to this article, apart from a CV-style list of papers. As nominator, I abstain; I'm relisting this because it didn't get consensus (or quality discussion) last time. Mangojuice 21:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable professor. Article was nominated for deletion previously (see here), but the debate was largely about academics in general, and was moved to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for inclusion of biographies/Academics and no consensus was reached. Nicholas Hopper is a promising young crypto researcher, and an assistant prof (not tenured) at UMN, and has about 10 technical papers of varying quality; the best has about 50 citations, which makes it a good paper, but not an especially important one. Not much more could be added to this article, apart from a CV-style list of papers. As nominator, I abstain; I'm relisting this because it didn't get consensus (or quality discussion) last time. Mangojuice 21:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC) reply