- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NexTech AR Solutions Corp. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not yet notable by WP:CORP. Company is listed on the CSE and the FSE, but as noted at WP:LISTED, while that should make it much more likely for a company to be notable, it doesn't guarantee it. So, while trying to replace the sea of press releases with some RS, I was surprised to find there's almost no independent, secondary coverage of the company online. Just a ton of press releases, and passing mentions in the financial press.
The article as created was pretty over-the-top marketing [1], complete with ™ symbols and gushing self-promo quotes from the CEO. This was made even worse last month by Special:Contributions/Purple_2020, whose COI was pretty obvious.
Editors User:WikiDan61, User:Canterbury Tail and I cleaned out most of the blatant marketing and lame attempts to connect the company with COVID response, but what remains is sourced only by press releases and sponsored content, and doesn't assert notability per WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Storchy ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Software, and Canada. Storchy ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Andre 🚐 18:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NCORP, I also did not find any sources that met even the WP:GNG standard, let alone NCORP. I also note the article creator is autopatrolled, but the article as initially written is so promotional I feels like it was written through some sort of WP:UPE. Jumpytoo Talk 20:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
NexTech AR Solutions Corp.
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- NexTech AR Solutions Corp. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not yet notable by WP:CORP. Company is listed on the CSE and the FSE, but as noted at WP:LISTED, while that should make it much more likely for a company to be notable, it doesn't guarantee it. So, while trying to replace the sea of press releases with some RS, I was surprised to find there's almost no independent, secondary coverage of the company online. Just a ton of press releases, and passing mentions in the financial press.
The article as created was pretty over-the-top marketing [1], complete with ™ symbols and gushing self-promo quotes from the CEO. This was made even worse last month by Special:Contributions/Purple_2020, whose COI was pretty obvious.
Editors User:WikiDan61, User:Canterbury Tail and I cleaned out most of the blatant marketing and lame attempts to connect the company with COVID response, but what remains is sourced only by press releases and sponsored content, and doesn't assert notability per WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Storchy ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Software, and Canada. Storchy ( talk) 09:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Andre 🚐 18:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NCORP, I also did not find any sources that met even the WP:GNG standard, let alone NCORP. I also note the article creator is autopatrolled, but the article as initially written is so promotional I feels like it was written through some sort of WP:UPE. Jumpytoo Talk 20:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.