The result of the debate was no consensus. bainer ( talk) 08:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, IMO. If this organization is notable enough to warrent an article, than there are a number of other local mycological societies (notably, the Mycological Society of San Francisco) that warrant an article. Alternately, this could be merged into an article called "Mycological societies", which could merge this with the already existing article Mycological Society of America, and add information on the North American Mycological Association, and other notable national and local mycological societies. Peter G Werner 09:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. bainer ( talk) 08:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, IMO. If this organization is notable enough to warrent an article, than there are a number of other local mycological societies (notably, the Mycological Society of San Francisco) that warrant an article. Alternately, this could be merged into an article called "Mycological societies", which could merge this with the already existing article Mycological Society of America, and add information on the North American Mycological Association, and other notable national and local mycological societies. Peter G Werner 09:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC) reply