The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to be a recently established music event in the southwest of England. Article is cited to a variety of non-secondary 'stuff on the internet' and I can't see any reliable independent news coverage online. Fails WP:GNG.
Sionk (
talk) 01:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)reply
In creating the article I did not find a large number of secondary sources however, the two given are of excellent quality. BBC Radio is an extremely reputable source as is the article from the Bristol Post, which is the region's biggest daily newspaper. On re-reading the article I note that it doesn't actually use the name New Music in the South West (an odd omission I grant), but it is clear from the context that the entire article is about NMSW. KeepMichael W Chance (
talk) 15:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 02:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Article now contains an additional reference to a secondary source, namely the Bristol based Weekend magazine.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 18:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Even if there was any proof this magazine exists, it would be completely insufficient to meet
WP:GNG.
Sionk (
talk) 23:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
"Even if there was any proof"? It's not hard to find, just Google "the weekend" magazine bristol.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 16:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable event with no reliable third party news coverage, fails
WP:GNG and
WP:TOOSOONTheroadislong (
talk) 23:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
OK. As a newbie I think Sionk's implication that I have invented a source to support a spurious article flies in the face of the guidelines I read in preparation of the article (not least presumed good faith). But the TOOSOON argument is, I suppose, reasonable in the circumstances.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 08:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to be a recently established music event in the southwest of England. Article is cited to a variety of non-secondary 'stuff on the internet' and I can't see any reliable independent news coverage online. Fails WP:GNG.
Sionk (
talk) 01:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)reply
In creating the article I did not find a large number of secondary sources however, the two given are of excellent quality. BBC Radio is an extremely reputable source as is the article from the Bristol Post, which is the region's biggest daily newspaper. On re-reading the article I note that it doesn't actually use the name New Music in the South West (an odd omission I grant), but it is clear from the context that the entire article is about NMSW. KeepMichael W Chance (
talk) 15:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 02:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Article now contains an additional reference to a secondary source, namely the Bristol based Weekend magazine.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 18:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Even if there was any proof this magazine exists, it would be completely insufficient to meet
WP:GNG.
Sionk (
talk) 23:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)reply
"Even if there was any proof"? It's not hard to find, just Google "the weekend" magazine bristol.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 16:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Non notable event with no reliable third party news coverage, fails
WP:GNG and
WP:TOOSOONTheroadislong (
talk) 23:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)reply
OK. As a newbie I think Sionk's implication that I have invented a source to support a spurious article flies in the face of the guidelines I read in preparation of the article (not least presumed good faith). But the TOOSOON argument is, I suppose, reasonable in the circumstances.
Michael W Chance (
talk) 08:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.