- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
New Foundations Charter School
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- New Foundations Charter School ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks significant coverage that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 04:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep - technically it passes my standards. It's been open for twenty years. Bearian ( talk) 16:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 04:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 04:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT) or NBUILD. Sources in the article are from the school and a listing with a few stats, nothing that could be considered SIGCOV. Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. Article does not meet NBUILD, "…they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage, the type all schools receive in local press. This is a normal school, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 16:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
New Foundations Charter School
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- New Foundations Charter School ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks significant coverage that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. GSS 💬 03:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 04:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep - technically it passes my standards. It's been open for twenty years. Bearian ( talk) 16:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 04:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 04:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT) or NBUILD. Sources in the article are from the school and a listing with a few stats, nothing that could be considered SIGCOV. Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth. Article does not meet NBUILD, "…they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." There is basic, run of the mill, routine, normal, coverage, the type all schools receive in local press. This is a normal school, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 16:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.