The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I came upon this article after seeing the same editor undertaking some suspicious activity that I think is COI/self-promotion adding the same patent nonsense about "Literature enters a new era i.e. Post-postmodernism with the publication of Md. Ziaul Haque’s “Give Me a Sky to Fly” in 2014." The subject of this page is not notable, the concept expressed is not discussed in real reliable sources such as reliable international or regional journals. This seems like someone's personal idea broadcast on Wikipedia (perhaps the ever ubiquitous "Haque" whose name and "work" keeps being inserted everywhere by the same user). Three of the sources are non-existent, the fourth IJHSSI article is not a credible or respected journal among literary scholars or historians, and the journal article itself is nonsense, reads like it was written by a computer program (like many science and maths journals criticized in the press) and is an article sourced by non-existent scholars, the source is nonsense. Delete for being patent nonsense, lacking notability, lacking reliable sourcing, and potential COI/self-promotion editing. ColonelHenry ( talk) 14:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I came upon this article after seeing the same editor undertaking some suspicious activity that I think is COI/self-promotion adding the same patent nonsense about "Literature enters a new era i.e. Post-postmodernism with the publication of Md. Ziaul Haque’s “Give Me a Sky to Fly” in 2014." The subject of this page is not notable, the concept expressed is not discussed in real reliable sources such as reliable international or regional journals. This seems like someone's personal idea broadcast on Wikipedia (perhaps the ever ubiquitous "Haque" whose name and "work" keeps being inserted everywhere by the same user). Three of the sources are non-existent, the fourth IJHSSI article is not a credible or respected journal among literary scholars or historians, and the journal article itself is nonsense, reads like it was written by a computer program (like many science and maths journals criticized in the press) and is an article sourced by non-existent scholars, the source is nonsense. Delete for being patent nonsense, lacking notability, lacking reliable sourcing, and potential COI/self-promotion editing. ColonelHenry ( talk) 14:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)