The result was nomination withdrawn. The sources provided by User:John Broughton convinced me that the company is most likely notable. It would be nice to have them actually integrated into the article, but at least this is sorted out now. ( Closed by the nominator.) Keφr 20:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Incomplete nomination by User:Mikefromnyc, who gave the reason "page is advertising for a for profit company". I shall remain neutral, although I will note that the sourcing for this article does not look great, and the article does sound quite like an advertisement (in itself WP:SURMOUNTABLE, but we need sources anyway). Keφr 07:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. The sources provided by User:John Broughton convinced me that the company is most likely notable. It would be nice to have them actually integrated into the article, but at least this is sorted out now. ( Closed by the nominator.) Keφr 20:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Incomplete nomination by User:Mikefromnyc, who gave the reason "page is advertising for a for profit company". I shall remain neutral, although I will note that the sourcing for this article does not look great, and the article does sound quite like an advertisement (in itself WP:SURMOUNTABLE, but we need sources anyway). Keφr 07:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC) reply