The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a blatant advertisement & does present itself at being notability. The few references they article does link don't appear to notable ore reliable resources. Article was originally in on Kantonus's userpage, they requested it be moved into the mainspace & as soon as user had enough edits to move into main space, moved it, even though movereq was clearly showing that it was mainspace material. 「 gu1dry」 ⊤ • ¢ 07:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Article is a blatant advertisement & does present itself at being notability. The few references they article does link don't appear to notable ore reliable resources. Article was originally in on Kantonus's userpage, they requested it be moved into the mainspace & as soon as user had enough edits to move into main space, moved it, even though movereq was clearly showing that it was mainspace material. 「 gu1dry」 ⊤ • ¢ 07:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply