- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep (nomination withdrawn). ( non-admin closure) Anupmehra - Let's talk! 20:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
NeoGen
- NeoGen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up nothing that rang the notability bell. PROD was removed. Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCar GT 22:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Passes WP:CORP per WP:LISTED, New York Times, Yahoo Finance. Valoem talk contrib 13:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just took another look at LISTED and this looks weak at best. LISTED does not abrogate the requirement for sources beyond mere affirmations of it's existence and current stock prices. But I will defer if a strong consensus among other editors says I'm being too narrow in my reading of CORP. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 15:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It also passes
WP:GNG per
NYTimes topic,
Market Watch, and
Seeking Alpha, multiple
WP:RS.
Valoem
talk
contrib 15:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Again you are only citing financial fact sheets that exist for almost every publicly traded company in the United States and most of the developed world. These are not analyst reports or in depth coverage beyond the financial equivalent to acknowledging something exists. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It also passes
WP:GNG per
NYTimes topic,
Market Watch, and
Seeking Alpha, multiple
WP:RS.
Valoem
talk
contrib 15:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just took another look at LISTED and this looks weak at best. LISTED does not abrogate the requirement for sources beyond mere affirmations of it's existence and current stock prices. But I will defer if a strong consensus among other editors says I'm being too narrow in my reading of CORP. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 15:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- On a side note however, I did just notice that the company has over a billion dollars in market capitalization. Billion dollar companies generally ring the notability bell for me. I'm going to take a closer look. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Withdraw AfD nom The article is in need of better references, but it is a billion dollar company that's on the NASDAQ. That's enough to push it over the goal line. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep (nomination withdrawn). ( non-admin closure) Anupmehra - Let's talk! 20:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
NeoGen
- NeoGen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up nothing that rang the notability bell. PROD was removed. Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCar GT 22:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Passes WP:CORP per WP:LISTED, New York Times, Yahoo Finance. Valoem talk contrib 13:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just took another look at LISTED and this looks weak at best. LISTED does not abrogate the requirement for sources beyond mere affirmations of it's existence and current stock prices. But I will defer if a strong consensus among other editors says I'm being too narrow in my reading of CORP. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 15:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It also passes
WP:GNG per
NYTimes topic,
Market Watch, and
Seeking Alpha, multiple
WP:RS.
Valoem
talk
contrib 15:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Again you are only citing financial fact sheets that exist for almost every publicly traded company in the United States and most of the developed world. These are not analyst reports or in depth coverage beyond the financial equivalent to acknowledging something exists. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It also passes
WP:GNG per
NYTimes topic,
Market Watch, and
Seeking Alpha, multiple
WP:RS.
Valoem
talk
contrib 15:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just took another look at LISTED and this looks weak at best. LISTED does not abrogate the requirement for sources beyond mere affirmations of it's existence and current stock prices. But I will defer if a strong consensus among other editors says I'm being too narrow in my reading of CORP. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 15:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- On a side note however, I did just notice that the company has over a billion dollars in market capitalization. Billion dollar companies generally ring the notability bell for me. I'm going to take a closer look. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Withdraw AfD nom The article is in need of better references, but it is a billion dollar company that's on the NASDAQ. That's enough to push it over the goal line. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.