- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 05:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nene derby ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisting of debate that got caught up in a bit of an unfocussed and inconclusive debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A62 derby.
I can't find any decent evidence that this derby is notable, and none is provided in the article. The rivalry may well exist (that is not being contested) but there is not sufficient non-routine documentation of it to pass the general notability guidelines. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 10:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 11:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 12:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - a quick search of the internet doesn't seem to bring up much at all; no evidence that the article can pass WP:GNG Spiderone 06:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - clear WP:NRIVALRY failure, proximity of clubs and the fact they have played does not inherently create rivalry. Fenix down ( talk) 10:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 05:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nene derby ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisting of debate that got caught up in a bit of an unfocussed and inconclusive debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A62 derby.
I can't find any decent evidence that this derby is notable, and none is provided in the article. The rivalry may well exist (that is not being contested) but there is not sufficient non-routine documentation of it to pass the general notability guidelines. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 10:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 11:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 12:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - a quick search of the internet doesn't seem to bring up much at all; no evidence that the article can pass WP:GNG Spiderone 06:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - clear WP:NRIVALRY failure, proximity of clubs and the fact they have played does not inherently create rivalry. Fenix down ( talk) 10:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.