- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Negi (caste)
- Negi (caste) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE. Boleyn ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Though I hesitate to offer opinions in areas like this where I have no knowledge, I cannot find anything anywhere to suggest that "Negi" is anything other than a surname, perhaps attached to the Kanet tribe or caste. This page has been repeatedly tagged as non-notable for years, and has been a magnet for all sorts of puffery and unsourced claims. It might be a good idea to salt it. — Gorthian ( talk) 21:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Gorthian; the onus needs to be on proving that the topic is notable and it is very difficult to see any evidence of notability here. Certainly, not enough for an article of its own in any case. Spiderone 20:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Negi (caste)
- Negi (caste) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE. Boleyn ( talk) 14:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:10, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Though I hesitate to offer opinions in areas like this where I have no knowledge, I cannot find anything anywhere to suggest that "Negi" is anything other than a surname, perhaps attached to the Kanet tribe or caste. This page has been repeatedly tagged as non-notable for years, and has been a magnet for all sorts of puffery and unsourced claims. It might be a good idea to salt it. — Gorthian ( talk) 21:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Gorthian; the onus needs to be on proving that the topic is notable and it is very difficult to see any evidence of notability here. Certainly, not enough for an article of its own in any case. Spiderone 20:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.