From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Naveed Zaidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to write a reasonably detailed biography. The first two sources give us his name, University of Durham and the invention. As far as independent reliable sources, that one sentence is all we know. It might belong in several places on Wikipedia, but it is not a biography. The third source, a primary source bio (and unarchived deadlink) is not useful for notability. SummerPhD ( talk) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Google scholar h-index of somewhere around 11 fails WP:Prof#C1 in this field. Claim to have developed organic room temperature magnet is just by one person in a large research group. Durham link is dead. Google hits are social media sites and mirrors of Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC). reply
  • Delete or redirect to plastic magnet per WP:BIO1E. His postdoctoral(?) supervisor on the plastic magnet research, A. P. Monkman, looks clearly notable by our WP:PROF standards, but I don't see the evidence of the same for Zaidi. Subject seems to have disappeared from the scholarly record after doing this research, so notability is unlikely to change. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Xxanthippe. -- 101.117.56.61 ( talk) 22:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Naveed Zaidi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to write a reasonably detailed biography. The first two sources give us his name, University of Durham and the invention. As far as independent reliable sources, that one sentence is all we know. It might belong in several places on Wikipedia, but it is not a biography. The third source, a primary source bio (and unarchived deadlink) is not useful for notability. SummerPhD ( talk) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Google scholar h-index of somewhere around 11 fails WP:Prof#C1 in this field. Claim to have developed organic room temperature magnet is just by one person in a large research group. Durham link is dead. Google hits are social media sites and mirrors of Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC). reply
  • Delete or redirect to plastic magnet per WP:BIO1E. His postdoctoral(?) supervisor on the plastic magnet research, A. P. Monkman, looks clearly notable by our WP:PROF standards, but I don't see the evidence of the same for Zaidi. Subject seems to have disappeared from the scholarly record after doing this research, so notability is unlikely to change. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Xxanthippe. -- 101.117.56.61 ( talk) 22:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook