The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. No real assertion of notability. Adult Broadcating Awards are given by a broadcaster to promote its own programming, and therefore fail the well-known/significant test. Moreover, the "mature actress"/MILF category by consensus general fails that standard, regardless of the awardgiver; while appearing in a video which wins a porn award makes no more than a negligible contribution to notability.. No biographical content. No reliable sourcing beyond databases; the Tokyo Reporter describes itself as "scurrilous" and has been characterized as a "hybrid of the National Enquirer, the New York Post and Penthouse. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (
talk)
01:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment I have pointed this out to the nominator several times, but the nominator's description of the award is wrong. The nominator has offered no evidence that the award is as he or she describes. As is described in this major news source
[1], it is an award that covers nearly 10,000 programs that were carried on SkyPerfecTV. SkyPerfecTV is the main satellite broadcaster in Japan and it carries hundreds of channels which are operated by other companies (including Fox, BBC, etc.). The award does not cover "its own programming" but merely programs that the channels programmed. It would be the equivalent of DirecTV or Sky sponsoring an award for programs broadcast on HBO, AMC, or the BBC. I have no opinion yet on this individual actress, but I would ask the nominator to stop mischaracterizing the award or at least offer proof that my evidence is incorrect.
Michitaro (
talk)
02:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. No real assertion of notability. Adult Broadcating Awards are given by a broadcaster to promote its own programming, and therefore fail the well-known/significant test. Moreover, the "mature actress"/MILF category by consensus general fails that standard, regardless of the awardgiver; while appearing in a video which wins a porn award makes no more than a negligible contribution to notability.. No biographical content. No reliable sourcing beyond databases; the Tokyo Reporter describes itself as "scurrilous" and has been characterized as a "hybrid of the National Enquirer, the New York Post and Penthouse. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (
talk)
01:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment I have pointed this out to the nominator several times, but the nominator's description of the award is wrong. The nominator has offered no evidence that the award is as he or she describes. As is described in this major news source
[1], it is an award that covers nearly 10,000 programs that were carried on SkyPerfecTV. SkyPerfecTV is the main satellite broadcaster in Japan and it carries hundreds of channels which are operated by other companies (including Fox, BBC, etc.). The award does not cover "its own programming" but merely programs that the channels programmed. It would be the equivalent of DirecTV or Sky sponsoring an award for programs broadcast on HBO, AMC, or the BBC. I have no opinion yet on this individual actress, but I would ask the nominator to stop mischaracterizing the award or at least offer proof that my evidence is incorrect.
Michitaro (
talk)
02:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.