- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Native 1080p or 60fps Xbox One Games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I fail to see how this list is important or necessary here, with the unnecessary emphasis on 1080p and 60fps. We have a more comprehensive and complete list like List of Xbox One games, and this is very redundant. AdrianGamer ( talk) 06:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Better covered as a category, or its own column at some sort of "List of Xbox One games" article, its just not necessary to have every single combination of factors for its own list like this. Sergecross73 msg me 14:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Merge any salvageable content to List of Xbox One games, or, if there isn't any salvageable content, Delete. Can fall under WP:IINFO. -- TL22 ( talk) 01:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No salvageable content, list of indiscriminate information. The topic of which games are what frames per second is not covered in reliable sourced coverage. – czar 17:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, I guess it could be done as a cat but either way as it stands now there's nothing worth keeping here. – Davey2010 Talk 16:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Native 1080p or 60fps Xbox One Games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I fail to see how this list is important or necessary here, with the unnecessary emphasis on 1080p and 60fps. We have a more comprehensive and complete list like List of Xbox One games, and this is very redundant. AdrianGamer ( talk) 06:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Better covered as a category, or its own column at some sort of "List of Xbox One games" article, its just not necessary to have every single combination of factors for its own list like this. Sergecross73 msg me 14:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Merge any salvageable content to List of Xbox One games, or, if there isn't any salvageable content, Delete. Can fall under WP:IINFO. -- TL22 ( talk) 01:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No salvageable content, list of indiscriminate information. The topic of which games are what frames per second is not covered in reliable sourced coverage. – czar 17:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, I guess it could be done as a cat but either way as it stands now there's nothing worth keeping here. – Davey2010 Talk 16:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.