- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
National Association for Cave Diving
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- National Association for Cave Diving ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, United States of America, and Florida. UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is a pet peeve of mine, could you maybe try and follow WP:AFDLIST, specifically "To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms." AFD is one of the first "behind the scenes" places many new users ancounter, and a nomination like this is not goinjg to be coherent to them. Beeblebrox ( talk) 16:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The above point aside, it does appear that the article is sourced almost entirely to the organization itself, and the problem was noted shortly after it was created thirteen years ago. That seems like more than enough time, and what appears to have been done instead is to simply expand the coverage of the organizations programs based on their own materials. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
National Association for Cave Diving
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- National Association for Cave Diving ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, United States of America, and Florida. UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is a pet peeve of mine, could you maybe try and follow WP:AFDLIST, specifically "To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms." AFD is one of the first "behind the scenes" places many new users ancounter, and a nomination like this is not goinjg to be coherent to them. Beeblebrox ( talk) 16:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The above point aside, it does appear that the article is sourced almost entirely to the organization itself, and the problem was noted shortly after it was created thirteen years ago. That seems like more than enough time, and what appears to have been done instead is to simply expand the coverage of the organizations programs based on their own materials. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.