- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Rewrite as Symple.. Consensus is that the person is not notable, but that her app may well be. Still no clear consensus about that, so the app article may be renominated for deletion. Sandstein 07:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Natasha Gajewski
- Natasha Gajewski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for non notable writer of a single app. The awards are trivial. DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Based on Gajewski's own experience, the app she has developed appears to be significant and has triggered considerable press coverage.-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: disagree that this is a promotional article, it's a biography. The app appears significant to a niche market and has been reported on in relevant media. MurielMary ( talk) 09:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep:the prose could use a little work, but her work is significant, judging based on the press coverage.Rachel Helps (BYU) ( talk) 19:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rename: After reading the other votes, I agree that the page should be for the app, not her. Rachel Helps (BYU) ( talk) 16:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Query Does the writer of an app inherit notability from the app? - The Bushranger One ping only 23:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rename Article is mostly about the app, which passes notability. However, the creator does not. Maybe re-title article to name of drug, and copyedit. Lee Vilenski( talk) 12:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing shows that Gajewski herself is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete maybe the app is notable, but probably not, and the person definitely is not. Notability is not inherited. (No prejudice to this being turned into an article about an app.) Dysklyver 15:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- neither the app, nor the subject is notable enough for an encyclopedia entry just yet. WP:TOOSOON. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete: source searches suggest the app itself is notable however notability isn't inherited and Gajewski doesn't have enough in-depth attention to be considered notable. I agree with the nominator in that the article is magniloquent and flowery, reading more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. Janet-O ( talk) 16:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Striking out sockpuppet !vote. User:Janet-O has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:DrStrauss. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Rewrite as Symple.. Consensus is that the person is not notable, but that her app may well be. Still no clear consensus about that, so the app article may be renominated for deletion. Sandstein 07:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Natasha Gajewski
- Natasha Gajewski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for non notable writer of a single app. The awards are trivial. DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Based on Gajewski's own experience, the app she has developed appears to be significant and has triggered considerable press coverage.-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: disagree that this is a promotional article, it's a biography. The app appears significant to a niche market and has been reported on in relevant media. MurielMary ( talk) 09:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep:the prose could use a little work, but her work is significant, judging based on the press coverage.Rachel Helps (BYU) ( talk) 19:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rename: After reading the other votes, I agree that the page should be for the app, not her. Rachel Helps (BYU) ( talk) 16:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Query Does the writer of an app inherit notability from the app? - The Bushranger One ping only 23:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rename Article is mostly about the app, which passes notability. However, the creator does not. Maybe re-title article to name of drug, and copyedit. Lee Vilenski( talk) 12:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing shows that Gajewski herself is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete maybe the app is notable, but probably not, and the person definitely is not. Notability is not inherited. (No prejudice to this being turned into an article about an app.) Dysklyver 15:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- neither the app, nor the subject is notable enough for an encyclopedia entry just yet. WP:TOOSOON. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete: source searches suggest the app itself is notable however notability isn't inherited and Gajewski doesn't have enough in-depth attention to be considered notable. I agree with the nominator in that the article is magniloquent and flowery, reading more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. Janet-O ( talk) 16:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Striking out sockpuppet !vote. User:Janet-O has been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:DrStrauss. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.