The result was Needs cleanup but from ratonales seems salvagable and somewhat notable. Keep for now. Tawker ( talk) 04:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability; article appears to fail WP:Notability (academics). According to talk page, main claim to establishing importance seems to be some quotes on the subject's own website.
Whilst a Google search, for instance, produces thousands of hits, on closer inspection, the majority of them appear to be video clips from the subject's DVD on Youtube-like sites, or forum posts. I can't really find anything that approaches non-trivial independent coverage.
Was originally PRODded; removed by article creator. Oli Filth( talk| contribs) 19:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Haramein has been published by the Noetic Press and has written extensive papers on theoretical physics, whether according to Wikipedia this makes him a 'scientist' or not. The link is on his Wiki page. However I did change the category so this "notability-academics" requirement might be removed and we could move on with a page on him on Wikipedia as a notable living person. I am hoping some other Wikipedia editors might come forth to provide an unbiased point of view on this. Avsav ( talk) 23:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Does the published material referenced on his page not suffice to include him as a notable living person? Avsav ( talk) 00:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I'd say, don't delete the article, but reword it to explain that he is another fringey new-age nutcase/crackpot with absolutely no academic credibility. Cgwaldman ( talk) 14:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Needs cleanup but from ratonales seems salvagable and somewhat notable. Keep for now. Tawker ( talk) 04:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability; article appears to fail WP:Notability (academics). According to talk page, main claim to establishing importance seems to be some quotes on the subject's own website.
Whilst a Google search, for instance, produces thousands of hits, on closer inspection, the majority of them appear to be video clips from the subject's DVD on Youtube-like sites, or forum posts. I can't really find anything that approaches non-trivial independent coverage.
Was originally PRODded; removed by article creator. Oli Filth( talk| contribs) 19:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Haramein has been published by the Noetic Press and has written extensive papers on theoretical physics, whether according to Wikipedia this makes him a 'scientist' or not. The link is on his Wiki page. However I did change the category so this "notability-academics" requirement might be removed and we could move on with a page on him on Wikipedia as a notable living person. I am hoping some other Wikipedia editors might come forth to provide an unbiased point of view on this. Avsav ( talk) 23:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Does the published material referenced on his page not suffice to include him as a notable living person? Avsav ( talk) 00:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I'd say, don't delete the article, but reword it to explain that he is another fringey new-age nutcase/crackpot with absolutely no academic credibility. Cgwaldman ( talk) 14:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply