From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be no obvious consensus coming from this discussion, even after being relisted twice. Closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. ( non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 05:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Nanae Kato (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only Ahiru as Nanae Kato's main role, and little to no news coverage and strong references, the subject in question is clearly not notable enough to warrant her own independent article. -- Sk8erPrince ( talk) 04:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
It's essentially a press release/promotional piece for a generic seiyuu band with six other members. It's hard to see how it could be evidence of notability. That they only lasted a few months before splitting the first time says a lot. SephyTheThird ( talk) 18:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 04:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
"I guess"? Does this mean that you're not entirely sure whether or not the subject should have her own independent article? Also, please read Sephy's post. -- Sk8erPrince ( talk) 08:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
No, it means I'm more or less on the fence and thus am defaulting towards keep, hence the "weak" part of my !vote. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 11:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be no obvious consensus coming from this discussion, even after being relisted twice. Closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. ( non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 05:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Nanae Kato (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only Ahiru as Nanae Kato's main role, and little to no news coverage and strong references, the subject in question is clearly not notable enough to warrant her own independent article. -- Sk8erPrince ( talk) 04:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC) reply
It's essentially a press release/promotional piece for a generic seiyuu band with six other members. It's hard to see how it could be evidence of notability. That they only lasted a few months before splitting the first time says a lot. SephyTheThird ( talk) 18:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ( speak to me) 04:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
"I guess"? Does this mean that you're not entirely sure whether or not the subject should have her own independent article? Also, please read Sephy's post. -- Sk8erPrince ( talk) 08:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply
No, it means I'm more or less on the fence and thus am defaulting towards keep, hence the "weak" part of my !vote. Satellizer el Bridget  (Talk) 11:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook