- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Names of India in its official languages
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Names of India in its official languages ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's basically a big list of unref'd translations, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTDICTIONARY. An alternative to deletion might be a merge to Names for India. PepperBeast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and India. PepperBeast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Merge This seems to be reasonable information to have in that article.
Reywas92
Talk
02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not reasonable, and in fact against the spirit of WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 04:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete; Names for India already exists, and unlike this article it at least tries to be more than a laundry list of dictionary entries. And no, not merge, delete. See WP:INDICSCRIPTS as to why a merge is unwarranted. We don't need to enumerate the name of every Indian topic in every one of its many scripts, and we have a policy in place specifically to guard against such tedium. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 04:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree it is more of an enumeration of dictionary entries rather than an article. Imranqazi90 ( talk)
- Delete per nomination. Sk1728 ( talk) 10:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Names of India in its official languages
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Names of India in its official languages ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's basically a big list of unref'd translations, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTDICTIONARY. An alternative to deletion might be a merge to Names for India. PepperBeast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and India. PepperBeast (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Merge This seems to be reasonable information to have in that article.
Reywas92
Talk
02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not reasonable, and in fact against the spirit of WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 04:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete; Names for India already exists, and unlike this article it at least tries to be more than a laundry list of dictionary entries. And no, not merge, delete. See WP:INDICSCRIPTS as to why a merge is unwarranted. We don't need to enumerate the name of every Indian topic in every one of its many scripts, and we have a policy in place specifically to guard against such tedium. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 04:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I agree it is more of an enumeration of dictionary entries rather than an article. Imranqazi90 ( talk)
- Delete per nomination. Sk1728 ( talk) 10:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.