- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Nah Cardoso
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nah Cardoso ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is a clear attempt to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. The article is filled with several paid/unreliable/non-independent references. It was created by a blocked/sock account and maintained by several other sock accounts. Plus, when it was created on Oct. 1, 2016 it was nominated for speedy deletion, but the nomination was contested by one of the creator's sock accounts. In the PT.WP (where people can read Portuguese) the article was deleted 9 times (including once via a AfD). Also there, on Pt.WP, the article was created and maintained by several sock accounts linked to user RafaelWalik, a globally locked and long-time abuser, who also created the article Leo Picon (which I also nominated for AfD). It looks like they are using WP as a soapbox. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 01:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 02:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Delete and create protect as this is clearly promotional. Having 6m+ followers does not automatically make you notable unless if you have been mentioned in reliable sources. Aasim ( talk) 02:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - a non-notable YouTuber; misuse of Wikipedia as an advertising space Spiderone 10:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, MySpace, Who's Who, or some other method of self-promotion. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Barely found anything about her. Article is definitely WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Nah Cardoso
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nah Cardoso ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is a clear attempt to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. The article is filled with several paid/unreliable/non-independent references. It was created by a blocked/sock account and maintained by several other sock accounts. Plus, when it was created on Oct. 1, 2016 it was nominated for speedy deletion, but the nomination was contested by one of the creator's sock accounts. In the PT.WP (where people can read Portuguese) the article was deleted 9 times (including once via a AfD). Also there, on Pt.WP, the article was created and maintained by several sock accounts linked to user RafaelWalik, a globally locked and long-time abuser, who also created the article Leo Picon (which I also nominated for AfD). It looks like they are using WP as a soapbox. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 01:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 02:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Delete and create protect as this is clearly promotional. Having 6m+ followers does not automatically make you notable unless if you have been mentioned in reliable sources. Aasim ( talk) 02:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - a non-notable YouTuber; misuse of Wikipedia as an advertising space Spiderone 10:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, MySpace, Who's Who, or some other method of self-promotion. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Barely found anything about her. Article is definitely WP:PROMOTIONAL. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.