- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
NAYI UMEED
- NAYI UMEED ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable founded in Nov 2014 clearly fails WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV and is promotional. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 23:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - re-creation of promotional article discussed at 2 previous AfDs: 1st nomination - no consensus and 2nd nomination - delete, with some involvement of COI/SPA-editors. No credible evidence of notability. Previously alleged offline-sources with in-depth coverage from independent sources would have to be provided by uninvolved editors to establish credible notability. Currently this is just self-promotion. GermanJoe ( talk) 05:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe ( talk) 06:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No credible claim of notability and the article's references barely go beyond demonstrating that the organization exists. I also note that the linked "official website" doesn't exist and that this version of the article appears to have been created by a member of the organization. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 00:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Absolutely nothing on any of the search engines about this organization. There is a similarly named tv show which gets some mentions, but not this org. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Onel5969 TT me 13:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
NAYI UMEED
- NAYI UMEED ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable founded in Nov 2014 clearly fails WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV and is promotional. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 23:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - re-creation of promotional article discussed at 2 previous AfDs: 1st nomination - no consensus and 2nd nomination - delete, with some involvement of COI/SPA-editors. No credible evidence of notability. Previously alleged offline-sources with in-depth coverage from independent sources would have to be provided by uninvolved editors to establish credible notability. Currently this is just self-promotion. GermanJoe ( talk) 05:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe ( talk) 06:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. No credible claim of notability and the article's references barely go beyond demonstrating that the organization exists. I also note that the linked "official website" doesn't exist and that this version of the article appears to have been created by a member of the organization. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 00:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Absolutely nothing on any of the search engines about this organization. There is a similarly named tv show which gets some mentions, but not this org. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Onel5969 TT me 13:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.