- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Mymensingh Premier League
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mymensingh Premier League ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A minor 100-ball cricket league with no indication of signifance. Article is poorly written and has very less details. 100 ball cricket itself is controversial and for a local league with a handful of professional players, this is more debatable. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep not a minor tournament as it has national TV coverage and 12 notable cricketers involved and coverage in national outlets such as Daily Star Bangladesh already in the article, passes
WP:GNG. As a side note, 100 ball cricket has been sanctioned by the English and Wales Cricket Board for a national competition so it is a mainstream format, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ Atlantic306: Just 12 notable players doesnt seem enough. Most of them are not proffessional cricketers. And details about all the matches in the tournament aren't there. The tournament that was sanctioned didn't even take place until now and all other such leagues doesn't have articles. The tournament also is not sanctioned by Bangladesh Cricket Board. Human ( talk) 10:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, A regular news from the daily star doesn't mean it's notable. It's not even Bangladesh Cricket Board approved. How can i say, it just a local tournament. Even cricinfo didn't listed it on their side (usually they list everything). No significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 17:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 11:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 11:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Mymensingh Premier League
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mymensingh Premier League ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A minor 100-ball cricket league with no indication of signifance. Article is poorly written and has very less details. 100 ball cricket itself is controversial and for a local league with a handful of professional players, this is more debatable. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Human ( talk) 21:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep not a minor tournament as it has national TV coverage and 12 notable cricketers involved and coverage in national outlets such as Daily Star Bangladesh already in the article, passes
WP:GNG. As a side note, 100 ball cricket has been sanctioned by the English and Wales Cricket Board for a national competition so it is a mainstream format, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk)
01:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ Atlantic306: Just 12 notable players doesnt seem enough. Most of them are not proffessional cricketers. And details about all the matches in the tournament aren't there. The tournament that was sanctioned didn't even take place until now and all other such leagues doesn't have articles. The tournament also is not sanctioned by Bangladesh Cricket Board. Human ( talk) 10:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, A regular news from the daily star doesn't mean it's notable. It's not even Bangladesh Cricket Board approved. How can i say, it just a local tournament. Even cricinfo didn't listed it on their side (usually they list everything). No significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 17:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 11:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 11:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.