The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nonnotability is only a speedy criterion for people and groups of people, not websites. That said, this website doesn't seem to meet the criteria for inclusion at
WP:WEB, so delete.
Angr (
talk)
14:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete; it sounds like it could be notable, but there's no firm evidence that it is, and I'm not finding much useful on google...
Mairi04:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nonnotability is only a speedy criterion for people and groups of people, not websites. That said, this website doesn't seem to meet the criteria for inclusion at
WP:WEB, so delete.
Angr (
talk)
14:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete; it sounds like it could be notable, but there's no firm evidence that it is, and I'm not finding much useful on google...
Mairi04:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.