From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Mustafa Naseem (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable under WP:PROF, and fails even GNG because the references are essentially all from the places where he's worked, or that have given him money, and therefore not independent--they are most of them apparently self-written (or PRstaff-written) promotional bios. DGG ( talk ) 18:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

  • DGG I hope you will go and learn from the references, Few are about his career where he worked(For Bio). Others are about his notability and news. There is no promotional content, if you feel there is any promotional sentence you can help to edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macrolancer ( talkcontribs) 05:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Promotional. Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG. Article has been "reference bombed" with sources which do nothing to establish notability. Most of the references resumes or PR bio, which does not meet the independent criteria for notability. The remainder are trivial mentions or about organizations he works/worked for. None of the sources are "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject' which is required to meet WP:GNG. Current References:
  • 1-6, 8, 10-14, 15, 17, 20, 24, 25, 27, are either resumes or short publicity bios
  • 7 was written by subject
  • 9 is a short video for IPAL- subject mentioned as director
  • 16 short mention as a alumni of U of Colorado
  • 18 is a brief mention as a speaker at IDDS
  • 19 One line mention as IPLA Director
  • 21 Subject's website
  • 22 One line thanks to subject for assistance in preparing case study in UNESCO report
  • 23 Video of subject Encouraging Students To Dream Again
  • 26 Announcement of subject being a finalist for Rolex Young Laureate Awards
  • 27 One line mention as a member of IDIN Network
Loading an article with a large number of sources will not make someone notable. CBS527 Talk 15:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Mustafa Naseem (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable under WP:PROF, and fails even GNG because the references are essentially all from the places where he's worked, or that have given him money, and therefore not independent--they are most of them apparently self-written (or PRstaff-written) promotional bios. DGG ( talk ) 18:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

  • DGG I hope you will go and learn from the references, Few are about his career where he worked(For Bio). Others are about his notability and news. There is no promotional content, if you feel there is any promotional sentence you can help to edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macrolancer ( talkcontribs) 05:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Promotional. Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG. Article has been "reference bombed" with sources which do nothing to establish notability. Most of the references resumes or PR bio, which does not meet the independent criteria for notability. The remainder are trivial mentions or about organizations he works/worked for. None of the sources are "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject' which is required to meet WP:GNG. Current References:
  • 1-6, 8, 10-14, 15, 17, 20, 24, 25, 27, are either resumes or short publicity bios
  • 7 was written by subject
  • 9 is a short video for IPAL- subject mentioned as director
  • 16 short mention as a alumni of U of Colorado
  • 18 is a brief mention as a speaker at IDDS
  • 19 One line mention as IPLA Director
  • 21 Subject's website
  • 22 One line thanks to subject for assistance in preparing case study in UNESCO report
  • 23 Video of subject Encouraging Students To Dream Again
  • 26 Announcement of subject being a finalist for Rolex Young Laureate Awards
  • 27 One line mention as a member of IDIN Network
Loading an article with a large number of sources will not make someone notable. CBS527 Talk 15:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook