- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted CSD G3: Blatant hoax -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 13:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Mushqil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unexplained contested PROD. My PROD reasoning: "Television program with no indication of notability and not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. All the sources I can find seem to only relate to a 1995 film and not to this series." Ducknish ( talk) 22:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
*Oppose. I am not the creator nor the one responsible for contesting this article, but I believe that the Star ONE thing and Indian association states notability.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 23:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- notability is not inherited, the subject of the article itself must be notable not merely have ties of some sort to something that is notable. WP:NOTINHERITED-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Then I change my opinion. Agreeing with
Deadly Red Pen and
Duckn-like, I believe that the article ought to be Deleted.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 23:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete no sources provided, none found. appears to be a shortlived run o the mill TV show that no one noticed or cared about when it was on the air. we are not in a position to change that now. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Then its very inclusion likely is be a hoax, found or created with original sources, its very inclusion violates "neutral point of view" and the creator of article has ulterior motivations in creating this article. This is extra evidence for DELETION. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted CSD G3: Blatant hoax -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 13:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Mushqil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unexplained contested PROD. My PROD reasoning: "Television program with no indication of notability and not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. All the sources I can find seem to only relate to a 1995 film and not to this series." Ducknish ( talk) 22:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
*Oppose. I am not the creator nor the one responsible for contesting this article, but I believe that the Star ONE thing and Indian association states notability.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 23:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- notability is not inherited, the subject of the article itself must be notable not merely have ties of some sort to something that is notable. WP:NOTINHERITED-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Then I change my opinion. Agreeing with
Deadly Red Pen and
Duckn-like, I believe that the article ought to be Deleted.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 23:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- delete no sources provided, none found. appears to be a shortlived run o the mill TV show that no one noticed or cared about when it was on the air. we are not in a position to change that now. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Then its very inclusion likely is be a hoax, found or created with original sources, its very inclusion violates "neutral point of view" and the creator of article has ulterior motivations in creating this article. This is extra evidence for DELETION. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.