The result was Delete. Srikeit 09:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Muderered schoolkid. Hit the newspapers at the time. No evidence of notability beyond that. Not encyclopedic - Docg 21:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep as being expanded This article forms part of the Wikiproject on British crime and has had another aticle mergeed into it the article is currently in the process of being expanded by myslef and given a few weeks the article will be fleshed out with more information. I say that deletion should be held off until expansion of the artticle has occured and not delted. In the article I have been very careful not to memorialise about the victim and the arrticle entry is not a biography it is an account of the murder. This link here shows why the article entry is important [1] as it was a high volume of pioneering forensic science which was used in the investigation.-- Lucy-marie 17:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC) reply
coment abduction, murder and high pioneeering forensics is not normally found in a typical murder investigation case.-- Lucy-marie 11:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply
comment A in Channel Five show was made of the murder showing the high levels of forensics that were used in the case so I think that does make the case a notable case. Also your comments on the beckhams when comparing to this are derogatory towards other editors and I think that poeple like you should try and do constructive things with wiki rather than going aorund trying to get articles deleted.-- Lucy-marie 18:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Dignity is just an essay and is in no way policy and cannot be applied to an account of a murder.-- Lucy-marie 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I think this is going over the top with this whole dignity treatin g the dead and living. If the account ios truthful and accurate then it does not infringe anything. Just because the truth may be offencive it doesn't mean it is disallowed.
The result was Delete. Srikeit 09:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Muderered schoolkid. Hit the newspapers at the time. No evidence of notability beyond that. Not encyclopedic - Docg 21:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep as being expanded This article forms part of the Wikiproject on British crime and has had another aticle mergeed into it the article is currently in the process of being expanded by myslef and given a few weeks the article will be fleshed out with more information. I say that deletion should be held off until expansion of the artticle has occured and not delted. In the article I have been very careful not to memorialise about the victim and the arrticle entry is not a biography it is an account of the murder. This link here shows why the article entry is important [1] as it was a high volume of pioneering forensic science which was used in the investigation.-- Lucy-marie 17:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC) reply
coment abduction, murder and high pioneeering forensics is not normally found in a typical murder investigation case.-- Lucy-marie 11:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply
comment A in Channel Five show was made of the murder showing the high levels of forensics that were used in the case so I think that does make the case a notable case. Also your comments on the beckhams when comparing to this are derogatory towards other editors and I think that poeple like you should try and do constructive things with wiki rather than going aorund trying to get articles deleted.-- Lucy-marie 18:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Dignity is just an essay and is in no way policy and cannot be applied to an account of a murder.-- Lucy-marie 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I think this is going over the top with this whole dignity treatin g the dead and living. If the account ios truthful and accurate then it does not infringe anything. Just because the truth may be offencive it doesn't mean it is disallowed.