- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Murder of Kevin Jiang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This looks like a WP:BLP1E (the policy extends to "recently deceased"). There are sources about the murder, all around the last month or so, but nothing that shows this has long-lasting significance like Death of Sarah Everard. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete for now at least. It looks like there is some continuing coverage of the manhunt aspect and such that may lead to an article in the future but as of now it doesn't look fit for a standalone article. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. My gut says there will be enough ongoing coverage to support an article, but it isn't there yet. The facts are not well enough known for an article at this point. Wait until the story has demonstrated lasting impact ( WP:SUSTAINED), enough facts have been published to support an encyclopedic article ( WP:NRV). At present there is only enough for something resembling a news report, not an encyclopedia article. The scope of the initial news coverage suggests that it will reach notability is coverage continues. At that point there may be many more facts available. There is no urgency. Wait. BiologicalMe ( talk) 15:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom, doesn't has long lasting significanct notability. Ambrosiawater ( talk) 15:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, NOTNEWS. No lasting notabilty. – S. Rich ( talk) 16:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Murder of Kevin Jiang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This looks like a WP:BLP1E (the policy extends to "recently deceased"). There are sources about the murder, all around the last month or so, but nothing that shows this has long-lasting significance like Death of Sarah Everard. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete for now at least. It looks like there is some continuing coverage of the manhunt aspect and such that may lead to an article in the future but as of now it doesn't look fit for a standalone article. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. My gut says there will be enough ongoing coverage to support an article, but it isn't there yet. The facts are not well enough known for an article at this point. Wait until the story has demonstrated lasting impact ( WP:SUSTAINED), enough facts have been published to support an encyclopedic article ( WP:NRV). At present there is only enough for something resembling a news report, not an encyclopedia article. The scope of the initial news coverage suggests that it will reach notability is coverage continues. At that point there may be many more facts available. There is no urgency. Wait. BiologicalMe ( talk) 15:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom, doesn't has long lasting significanct notability. Ambrosiawater ( talk) 15:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, NOTNEWS. No lasting notabilty. – S. Rich ( talk) 16:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.