From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snow delete. No reliable source indicating this is a populated place Firsfron of Ronchester 19:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Mumurva, Arizona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any coverage of this place under any of its names. Appears to have just been a well. – dlthewave 19:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

WP:GEOLAND was recently updated and now states that that source (GNIS) is not reliable for establishing the notability of populated places (it sometimes misidentifies family farms and railroad sidings as "populated places"). Magnolia677 ( talk) 05:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
I'm not referring to GNIS, which, as I understand it, is a database. This was a DOI publication. It's currently reference #3 in the article. RecycledPixels ( talk) 05:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Apparently, the URL I linked in the reference wasn't very useful, so I've updated it, so hopefully it points to the correct location. RecycledPixels ( talk) 05:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Striking keep after reading the GNIS article. I am not persuaded that the source I found and added is sufficiently different from the GNIS database that has problems identifying populated places. RecycledPixels ( talk) 06:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Additional source "Becoming Hopi: A History" through Google Books mentions Mumurva, and identifies it as a spring on page 37. A second book, "Hopi Animal Stories", also on Google Books, makes a passing mention of Mumurva, and identifies it as a spring (p.58). Not a settled place. Both mentions are trivial in nature and not enough to satisfy WP:GNG RecycledPixels ( talk) 18:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snow delete. No reliable source indicating this is a populated place Firsfron of Ronchester 19:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Mumurva, Arizona (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any coverage of this place under any of its names. Appears to have just been a well. – dlthewave 19:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

WP:GEOLAND was recently updated and now states that that source (GNIS) is not reliable for establishing the notability of populated places (it sometimes misidentifies family farms and railroad sidings as "populated places"). Magnolia677 ( talk) 05:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
I'm not referring to GNIS, which, as I understand it, is a database. This was a DOI publication. It's currently reference #3 in the article. RecycledPixels ( talk) 05:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Apparently, the URL I linked in the reference wasn't very useful, so I've updated it, so hopefully it points to the correct location. RecycledPixels ( talk) 05:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Striking keep after reading the GNIS article. I am not persuaded that the source I found and added is sufficiently different from the GNIS database that has problems identifying populated places. RecycledPixels ( talk) 06:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Additional source "Becoming Hopi: A History" through Google Books mentions Mumurva, and identifies it as a spring on page 37. A second book, "Hopi Animal Stories", also on Google Books, makes a passing mention of Mumurva, and identifies it as a spring (p.58). Not a settled place. Both mentions are trivial in nature and not enough to satisfy WP:GNG RecycledPixels ( talk) 18:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook